Ultherapy vs. Injectables: Which is better for treating wrinkles?

Ultherapy and injectables are common anti-aging treatments that can smooth fine lines and wrinkles, and rejuvenate the appearance. There are pros and cons for both types of treatment, so when it comes to ultherapy vs injectables, some people are not sure which is better for treating wrinkles.

Ultherapy is a non-surgical treatment for the face and neck, which uses focused ultrasound energy to tighten and tone the skin. Ultherapy stimulates the production of collagen, and as more collagen is produced wrinkles and fine lines are filled in, so the face looks smoother and younger.

Injectables such as botox and fillers are also important tools in facial rejuvenation. Botox specifically targets dynamic wrinkles such as those across the forehead, and between the eyebrows.

Dynamic wrinkles are formed as a result as continued muscle movement, and since botox relaxes the muscles, it is very effective for treating these types of wrinkles. Soft tissue fillers are also used to plump the face and smooth out wrinkles.

Ultherapy vs Injectables – Which one is better
This depends on the areas you need treated, and are most concerned about. If you are looking to treat forehead lines and wrinkles, then botox is the better option. However, if you want to smooth wrinkles on other areas of the face Ultherapy is better, because it affects the foundational layer of the skin and stimulates collagen.

Also, the effects of Ultherapy can last 1-2 years when compared to soft tissue fillers that last an average of 6-9 months.

Facial rejuvenation treatments using Ultherapy and injectables are available in Orange County, CA at Song Plastic Surgery in Irvine. Why not give us a call today at949-701-4454to set up a consultation with Dr. Kyle Song.

Like this article?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Pinterest